Comments for Joe Harter's Blog http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:50:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on How I’d Test it – Re: Matt Heusser’s Challenge by Julia http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/how-id-test-it-re-matt-heussers-challenge/#comment-8 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:50:14 +0000 http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-8 Since the challenge is probably over – I think this would be a great focus for a workshop. I am at a client site where they have been strictly waterfall and heavy, heavy on the process for a long time. Now they are somewhat open to trying some new things. So I am easing them into exploratory testing ideas. It would be fun to try this with them.

]]> Comment on How I’d Test it – Re: Matt Heusser’s Challenge by Matt Heusser's Blog » Test This – Finale - Testing at the Edge of Chaos http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/how-id-test-it-re-matt-heussers-challenge/#comment-7 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:54:38 +0000 http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-7 [...] of the entries, Joe Harter and Justin Rohrman were unique, in that they did not actually define test cases – instead, [...]

]]> Comment on How I’d Test it – Re: Matt Heusser’s Challenge by Matt Heusser's Blog » Test This – The Entries - Testing at the Edge of Chaos http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/how-id-test-it-re-matt-heussers-challenge/#comment-6 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:02:32 +0000 http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-6 [...] Several went on to post their own blog entires: ** Marlena Compton ** Joe Harter ** Justin Rohrman (with a follow-up) ** Markus Gaertner (with a Part II) ** And, last but not [...]

]]> Comment on Going Through the Motions by Michael Bolton http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/going-through-the-motions/#comment-5 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:01:37 +0000 http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-5 Bravo, Joe!

I say that in part for making the distinction between the two kinds of pausing which I could adopt; we originally did have it broken into two pretty much as you describe, and thanks to your I’ll consider breaking them out again)

But mostly I say Bravo for the last paragraph.

Cheers,

—Michael B.

]]> Comment on Tests and Test Cases by Matthew Heusser http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/tests-and-test-cases/#comment-3 Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:07:52 +0000 http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-3 Sweet, man. I just put something similar up at Creative Chaos – that I don’t see a ton of value in test management tools.

Rock on.

]]> Comment on Tests and Test Cases by Ajay Balamurugadas http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/tests-and-test-cases/#comment-2 Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:07:34 +0000 http://joeharterqa.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-2 Nice write-up. Lucky that Venkat reports to someone like you.

Yes, its a good practice not to give importance to number of test cases or even to number of bugs.

Value is what is important. The more valuable the information, the more closer is the person to the mission.

Regards,
Ajay

]]>